All
major U.S. metropolitan areas fall within either 100 miles of the border or are
near a port of entry or both.
Finally, “child” is defined in this legislation as any individual who has not reached 18 years old who has no permanent immigration status. This astonishing definition includes U.S. citizens under the age of 18. Citizen children by definition have no immigration status, permanent or otherwise. (Even if the Democrats belatedly amended this provision to restrict the definition to alien children without a permanent immigration status, that amended definition would still include non-migrant aliens, like tourist children, Deferred Action for Child Arrivals recipients under the age of 18, and children whose parents have had their immigration status revoked.)
Thus, far from addressing the border crisis, the Democrats’ Keep Families Together Act applies almost everywhere in the country to prohibit any DHS, DOJ, or HHS officer from removing almost any child from a parent. The listed exceptions to the prohibition—a state court authorizes separation, a state child welfare agency determines that the child is in danger, or certain DHS officials establish that the child is a victim of trafficking or is in danger from the parent, or that the parent is not the actual parent of the child—are completely unrelated to the vast majority of DHS, DOJ, and HHS enforcement activity.
Two groups would not benefit from the prohibition on family separation in this bill. First, parents who have children with a permanent immigration status go unprotected. Additionally, the childless would obviously find no shelter from this legislation. This disparity in treatment for the childless and lawful permanent residents borders on the farcical.
The ridiculous consequences of passing the Democrats’ hastily written mess are easily demonstrated. Let’s say FBI agents hear about a drug trafficker and murderer in Buffalo, New York. The agents get a warrant to raid the drug trafficker’s house and arrest him. While they do so, they discover the drug trafficker’s minor daughter is home with him. Feinstein’s bill would prohibit the FBI agents, while arresting a drug trafficker, from separating this child from her father.
This is not a farfetched hypothetical. FBI agents are agents of DOJ (a designated agency) and Buffalo is within 100 miles of the border. So long as the daughter is either a U.S. citizen or an alien without permanent status, the FBI agents would be unable to proceed with normal law enforcement activities. The agents would be forced to choose between booking the drug trafficking murderer into jail with his daughter or not booking him into jail at all.
Panicky lawmaking often produces absurd results, and this one presents law enforcement with the choice between keeping children with their criminal parents while prosecuting them almost anywhere in the United States and for any crime whatsoever, or not prosecuting criminal parents at all. The legislation is not limited to unlawful entry prosecutions, to migrants, or (absent amendment) even to alien children.
A more honest method of ending unlawful entry prosecutions—and the family separations that ensue—would be to repeal 8 U.S.C. § 1325, which criminalizes unlawful entry in the first place. That would at least have the benefit of not curtailing federal enforcement of every other criminal law on the books for parents who keep their children close.
You can take it here: Trump Is A Puto T Shirt
Review Trump Is A Puto V-neck Shirt
You did not hear about this on the news did you? Laura Wegscheid I understood Larry Henderson question
perfectly. What do you not understand? Better living conditions cost money and
we are doing all we can for these children. They are not in cages, get your
facts stop believing in the false staged media for their political games. These
children are in better living conditions then I have personally seen America
children living here in our country. Sometimes taking the children away from
the adult that brought them is necessary. How do you know if the child belongs
to that person and are they safe with them or with us? There has to be a
process to determine all these facts. This process takes time because of the
limited resources we have and staff. All those staff people have families too,
they want to go home safe. There is not a clear perfect solution to this
problem, other than to build a wall, protect our Recovering Carboholic Shirt, stop allowing a free
ride into this country which overburdened our system that is already suffering.
Let's put it this way, if for some reasons the powers that be get their way and
we have open borders then this country will fall into poverty worst than you
can ever image. Now, the powers that be will not be worried they have their
millions and will not be there for you. i just noticed Colleen Connors said it
best we will become a third world country. Zena Fargo Yes, God is the
one that tells us this in the Bible.... " (Matthew 10:16). God gives us
certain standards that we must take into account when it comes to giving our
time and money to others. When the Bible tells us we are to help others,
the purpose is never for us to do this to the point where it becomes
detrimental. It's good to do what we're able to do, but 2 Thessalonians 3:10
also reminds us, "If a man will not work, he shall not eat." There
are people who want to live an irresponsible lifestyle with absolutely no
accountability. So there must be limits; we will help Jean Ralphio The Wooorst Three Jean Moon Shirt with a need, but
if we see that it's become a chronic life pattern, it's wrong for us to
continue to encourage that. It's very harmful to others to contribute to their
indolence, laziness, and lack of effort. The old saying "Give a man a fish
and he eats for a day, teach him to fish and he eats for a lifetime" is
very true. As long as we see that someone is sincerely making an effort, we
should be there to support him in whatever way God leads." Do you know who
God is? Eleanor Acinelli not sure where the 20 years on the dole idea came
from. I'm talking about detaining people and sending them back to their home
country, not letting them go. And, despite popular belief on this Families Belong Together Shirt,
immigrants--even those who cross illegally--have due process rights. Tina Inman
Wicker I haven't criticized the living conditions of the kids. I object to
taking kids from their parents. If there's cause to believe the child is in
danger, then we should be at least temporarily removing them from the adult
until things are sorted out. I'm not arguing against that. I'm arguing against
removing children from their parents as a matter of course. I believe that to
be cruel and inhumane. As I find myself saying over and over, one can be
opposed to open borders and also opposed to taking kids away from their
parents. need to be required to identify ones political affiliation on tax
returns, then can charge all the democratizes higher taxes let them pay for all
these services giving to the illegals! Laura Wegscheid be opposed to having the
parents sending the kids to the border in the first place, that's like saying
release the prisoners cause the kids are waiting outside the jailhouse or you
can't send soldiers to fight cause the kids will be by themselves. Himanshu
Malik Another idiot that doesn't understand how civilization worked. Every
peice of land in the world was conquered. So no this land wasn't stolen it was
conquered. That’s what Democraps and there socialism is all about. Shared
misery for the Fortnite Just Play It T Shirt while the ruling political class lives above it. Never
thought I’d see it come to America but it had in a big way. Mary Ann Venose I
have no idea what your comment means. You might want to make some edits and add
some punctuation so that it’s coherent. Laura
Wegscheid national defense is one of the most important responsibilities of our
government. You are proposing that conservatives pay more taxes because they
support the military. Does that mean that if we are invaded the military would
only protect conservatives because they are the only ones that have paid for
the protection? Thomas Schewe We are
being invaded. Just because they are storming our border without guns makes it
no less an invasion. It's called No One Is Illegal On Stolen Land Shirt. The kids have probably
always been there. They don't go film all the kids being taken away from
mother's and father's who go to prison or jail. But they are latching onto this
because they want to make Trump look
bad, and they are irked because so far nothing of any significance has slowed
him down. In Mexico there is 1 US Embassy and 9 consulats in the various
regions. A non US citizen with a family my walk in to any of them and request
asylum and not be separated from their families. Is that too simple or I guess
they would rather rush the US borders. Leslie
Jackson Thank you ...... Isn't that the truth as we now see ALL the MSM
stations including CNN now HAVE to say the photos they blasted thinking it
would NOT be revealed are from OBAMA in 2014!
Maybe you like: https://photoxtee.com/trending/splatoon-2-world-championship-shirt/
It was so funny when it was REVEALED to see egg on their faces !! Or else they are out there making more noise such as along the Mexican border where they are happily selling our country down the river. !!!!! Jerky Williams because they crossed illegally we have 9 consulates and 1 embassy in Mexico there is no reason for them to be making this Logic Rick And Morty Shirt to our borders and committing a crime. They could apply there. Jerky Williams Nope, not true. Separating and incarcerating the adults and now families only applies to people who cross the border BETWEEN ports of entry and therefore have illegally entered the US.. If you come with papers, or request asylum at at port of entry, you haven't committed a crime and are processed at entry. You are absolutely correct. They may also ask for asylum at the Mexico border when they entered that country from Guatemala or ElSalvador. Jerky Williams, you are absolutely incorrect and getting your information from someone other than the actual people at the border. Over 1,000 kid's aged 12 - 17 arrived at the border unchaperoned, meaning they had no adult with them. Of 10,000+, 2800 were detained including children and adults who entered illegal entry points, had no parent or family member's present, or no documentation at all. That is absolutely true, as the illegal border crossers in Mexico can still legally request asylum. They are however, susceptible to being charged with crossing the US border illegally (i.e., not at a port of entry), which is a Rip X Shirt the first time...a felony thereafter. Unless and until the US stops being the US people will come, some of course illegally. The president seems to be baffled by the fact that his name alone isn't stopping them. In stead of prosecuting people for illegal border crossing these funds should go to the office of immigration review so that we can find out who should be granted asylum and who shouldn't or can't. OIR already has a process in place to deal with families caught crossing, they simply lack resources to process the existing cases.
2018 is on track to be an average year when compared to 2013-2016 and the overall trend for the past 15 or so years shows that illegal crossings are on the decline. You can only apply for asylum while physically in the US, not at a consulate or embassy. So you guessed wrong. Jerky Williams When you have a need to name-call (dummy) it means you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation. Please don’t live up to your first name. Jerky Williams All he was doing was enforcing the law that is on the books which by the way is his job.
See more shirt: https://photoxtee.com/
Finally, “child” is defined in this legislation as any individual who has not reached 18 years old who has no permanent immigration status. This astonishing definition includes U.S. citizens under the age of 18. Citizen children by definition have no immigration status, permanent or otherwise. (Even if the Democrats belatedly amended this provision to restrict the definition to alien children without a permanent immigration status, that amended definition would still include non-migrant aliens, like tourist children, Deferred Action for Child Arrivals recipients under the age of 18, and children whose parents have had their immigration status revoked.)
Thus, far from addressing the border crisis, the Democrats’ Keep Families Together Act applies almost everywhere in the country to prohibit any DHS, DOJ, or HHS officer from removing almost any child from a parent. The listed exceptions to the prohibition—a state court authorizes separation, a state child welfare agency determines that the child is in danger, or certain DHS officials establish that the child is a victim of trafficking or is in danger from the parent, or that the parent is not the actual parent of the child—are completely unrelated to the vast majority of DHS, DOJ, and HHS enforcement activity.
Two groups would not benefit from the prohibition on family separation in this bill. First, parents who have children with a permanent immigration status go unprotected. Additionally, the childless would obviously find no shelter from this legislation. This disparity in treatment for the childless and lawful permanent residents borders on the farcical.
The ridiculous consequences of passing the Democrats’ hastily written mess are easily demonstrated. Let’s say FBI agents hear about a drug trafficker and murderer in Buffalo, New York. The agents get a warrant to raid the drug trafficker’s house and arrest him. While they do so, they discover the drug trafficker’s minor daughter is home with him. Feinstein’s bill would prohibit the FBI agents, while arresting a drug trafficker, from separating this child from her father.
This is not a farfetched hypothetical. FBI agents are agents of DOJ (a designated agency) and Buffalo is within 100 miles of the border. So long as the daughter is either a U.S. citizen or an alien without permanent status, the FBI agents would be unable to proceed with normal law enforcement activities. The agents would be forced to choose between booking the drug trafficking murderer into jail with his daughter or not booking him into jail at all.
Panicky lawmaking often produces absurd results, and this one presents law enforcement with the choice between keeping children with their criminal parents while prosecuting them almost anywhere in the United States and for any crime whatsoever, or not prosecuting criminal parents at all. The legislation is not limited to unlawful entry prosecutions, to migrants, or (absent amendment) even to alien children.
A more honest method of ending unlawful entry prosecutions—and the family separations that ensue—would be to repeal 8 U.S.C. § 1325, which criminalizes unlawful entry in the first place. That would at least have the benefit of not curtailing federal enforcement of every other criminal law on the books for parents who keep their children close.
You can take it here: Trump Is A Puto T Shirt
Review Trump Is A Puto V-neck Shirt
Maybe you like: https://photoxtee.com/trending/splatoon-2-world-championship-shirt/
It was so funny when it was REVEALED to see egg on their faces !! Or else they are out there making more noise such as along the Mexican border where they are happily selling our country down the river. !!!!! Jerky Williams because they crossed illegally we have 9 consulates and 1 embassy in Mexico there is no reason for them to be making this Logic Rick And Morty Shirt to our borders and committing a crime. They could apply there. Jerky Williams Nope, not true. Separating and incarcerating the adults and now families only applies to people who cross the border BETWEEN ports of entry and therefore have illegally entered the US.. If you come with papers, or request asylum at at port of entry, you haven't committed a crime and are processed at entry. You are absolutely correct. They may also ask for asylum at the Mexico border when they entered that country from Guatemala or ElSalvador. Jerky Williams, you are absolutely incorrect and getting your information from someone other than the actual people at the border. Over 1,000 kid's aged 12 - 17 arrived at the border unchaperoned, meaning they had no adult with them. Of 10,000+, 2800 were detained including children and adults who entered illegal entry points, had no parent or family member's present, or no documentation at all. That is absolutely true, as the illegal border crossers in Mexico can still legally request asylum. They are however, susceptible to being charged with crossing the US border illegally (i.e., not at a port of entry), which is a Rip X Shirt the first time...a felony thereafter. Unless and until the US stops being the US people will come, some of course illegally. The president seems to be baffled by the fact that his name alone isn't stopping them. In stead of prosecuting people for illegal border crossing these funds should go to the office of immigration review so that we can find out who should be granted asylum and who shouldn't or can't. OIR already has a process in place to deal with families caught crossing, they simply lack resources to process the existing cases.
2018 is on track to be an average year when compared to 2013-2016 and the overall trend for the past 15 or so years shows that illegal crossings are on the decline. You can only apply for asylum while physically in the US, not at a consulate or embassy. So you guessed wrong. Jerky Williams When you have a need to name-call (dummy) it means you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation. Please don’t live up to your first name. Jerky Williams All he was doing was enforcing the law that is on the books which by the way is his job.
See more shirt: https://photoxtee.com/
Comments
Post a Comment