We took the factory tour, and it was very
interesting. At the country store, tried Tabasco Coke and ice cream, among
other tasty things. Love this and the country store! There are some tobacco
products you can only get from the local tabasco store. The family reserve is
pretty yummy, so is the soy sauce, green beans...etc. WooHoo! I LOVE
both of these stories! I declared Facade as my favorite novella ever. And YES!
I'm a hat girl and so is my daughter --> this showed up on my feed this
morning from last year. Funny coincidence huh?? You guys are twinning. I am not
a hat person. Anytime I wear one, my family snickers. Either I haven't found the
right hat style yet, or I'm just not meant to wear them. (That, plus the
hatbands always give me a headache, so there's that, too.) I actually bought a new hat a couple days ago. I’m not a
hat person but I’m trying to become one. Which explains why I bough a new hat!
Love your red hair
😍 Aw! Thank you, Shamekka! You are so sweet! I’m
sure your hat is fabulous! You may start a new trend with your friends. Florida is my happy place! Whenever we visit I’m wearing a
hat all the time for two reasons. Blocking the sun & taming my crazy
hair. I am pro for hats. I wear more hats in the fall/winter than
spring/summer, but I still love sun hats. I used to treat my sun hats like
sunglasses because I wore prescription glasses. I have transitions now, but I
still love sun hats and wear them (because they're adorable). I really only wear hats when I'm outside doing yard work
so the top of my head doesn't sunburn. Otherwise, I personally don't wear them.
I think hats are pretty on those that wear them. Hello friends, I come to share my joy. After having
traveled several banks without results, a friend told me about Mrs. Maria
Durieux Shareholder in a French bank that made me a loan of k500,000 online,
payable long term. If you have financial problems here his mail:
E-mail: mariadurieux@outlook.com.
Available here: Pick Your Pepper T Shirt 2018
Review Pick Your Pepper Sweater 2018
E-mail: mariadurieux@outlook.com. Some recipe's in life are worth the bother. This recipe by Emeril Lagasse is all in and ready to rock the July 4th week end. I wish human beings could have a tongue out day like the K-9 police dogs do.....this would be the time to start! Yeah, RateMyProfessor is nonsense. Now, those student evaluations the university conducts that determine your future? Totally different and valid. With or without the chili pepper, it is still nonsense with no statistically reliable information to be garnered and no proper survey protocols put in place. It does not even require proof that one is a student or has been a student in the class...Anyone who clicks "I am not a robot" can submit a Families Belong Together Shirt rating on any professor's page. It is nonsense and it will continue to be viewed as nonsense by any sane person at a university. A student could still write something in the comments section so not having a hotness rating doesn’t really matter.
Years ago I had them remove comments about my appearance that bordered on stalker. So removing it doesn’t prevent comments. First of all, administration should only be ratifying faculty hiring dicisions, so it should have no use for student ratings (faculty judges teaching). Second, rmp is useless as a tool for judging teaching. Third, and most shocking, the purpose of rmp is to help students find hot profs who teach easy course. It has now lost its raison d'être. Ugh, at least they've taken away the pepper. I dislike the site for many reasons (not the least of which is that anyone can say anything about anyone anonymously without any accountability, whether the commentator actually took a class from that person or not -- try it yourself, go and give a colleague a glowing review -- and the Jean Ralphio The Wooorst Three Jean Moon Shirt has absolutely no recourse except to dispute under their own name and so open themselves to trolling), but I especially loathed the chili pepper and avoided the site because I just... don't... want... to... know. These ratings may not be statistically valid, and certainly have self selection bias, but on a qualitative “anec-data” level, they definitely tend to paint quite an accurate picture of many professors’ teaching styles.
Maybe you like: https://photoxtee.com/trending/taylor-swift-cat-shirt/
Considering that several professors see comments about their appearance, sexually harassing comments, and character assaults in the Twitter-Style comments students leave there, and considering the website doesn't even require proof that one is a student in the class (a simple "Yes, I am in the class" and "I am not a robot" is not proof), I can't see how the majority of Rate-my-Professor ratings function even as a useful "anec-data" picture. Could you elaborate? It seems to me that many of the ones getting a 5 for easy are in fact the ones who give out A’s like candy and whose classes lack rigor. But is this statistically valid? No. Do I look at this website when I’m on a search committee screening Lebron James Ultimate Warrior T Shirt? No. Certainly should not be used for hiring decisions. But my few observations are that, like it or not, many of the reviews I have read give some amount of insight into how a faculty member behaves, not just in the classroom but as a colleague. I am still unclear on the utility here. If they aren't statistically valid, if we don't use them for hiring/promotion decisions, and should not because we cannot verify where and who the comments are coming from, why are we looking at it? How are you determining these portrayals are accurate? We can observe our colleagues as educators and as colleagues first-hand without a questionable website poll as a middle-man. Well, in this day and age of Yelp, Amazon reviews, and other “crowd sourced” information, the end user (in this case, students) will see great utility in “peer reviews” from their peers. Which means they still need to learn information literacy and critical source analysis skills. Since anyone can write anything on a Rate-My-Professor rating, without even proving that they had ever taken the course, it is a truly worthless site, even for students, and they shouldn't trust it either. You’re right that the reviews would be much more believable if the site somehow synced with student educational records to prove they took the class—the same way Amazon has “verified purchases”—but I’m sure you’d agree that FERPA laws and antiquated student record software would make this impossible for this site to implement. That doesn’t make them entirely useless for a reader, though. Just as unanimous No One Is Illegal On Stolen Land Shirt about an employer on Glassdoor are often correct, so unanimous reviews of a professor are often correct. “Grain of salt” applies, of course. If students want something like this, a far more reliable source would be to make the basic, anonymized, aggregate data from official evals conducted by the university which we are already collecting available to students rather than relying on a questionable third-party platform that generates revenue from ad sales. Even Amazon controls its own review system. By all means I don't think this website should be what qualifies those for employment; but like any review site (bias included), they paint an honest portrait of one's own experience. It shouldn't be seen as anything but a student-specific review platform. Well, if you were a student about to invest, say, $250,000 into your education, wouldn’t you want some source of information on the quality of teaching you will receive? And if your university makes no other reviews available, how are you supposed to make such a decision? Until such time as universities take teaching more seriously and are more transparent for students, sites like RMP will continue to thrive. If you want them to end, pressure your provost to publish the anonymous teaching reviews. Also, since we are complaining about what makes or does not make valid and reliable sources of rating and ranking information about higher education, perhaps we should have a different conversation about the validity and reliability of things like the US News and World Report rankings. Students can and do make serious enrollment decisions based on those rankings, and from my understanding, most of the time they are truly nothing more than a popularity contest among deans of different schools.
See more: Photoxtee
😍 Aw! Thank you, Shamekka! You are so sweet! I’m
sure your hat is fabulous! You may start a new trend with your friends. Florida is my happy place! Whenever we visit I’m wearing a
hat all the time for two reasons. Blocking the sun & taming my crazy
hair. I am pro for hats. I wear more hats in the fall/winter than
spring/summer, but I still love sun hats. I used to treat my sun hats like
sunglasses because I wore prescription glasses. I have transitions now, but I
still love sun hats and wear them (because they're adorable). I really only wear hats when I'm outside doing yard work
so the top of my head doesn't sunburn. Otherwise, I personally don't wear them.
I think hats are pretty on those that wear them. Hello friends, I come to share my joy. After having
traveled several banks without results, a friend told me about Mrs. Maria
Durieux Shareholder in a French bank that made me a loan of k500,000 online,
payable long term. If you have financial problems here his mail:E-mail: mariadurieux@outlook.com.
Available here: Pick Your Pepper T Shirt 2018
Review Pick Your Pepper Sweater 2018
E-mail: mariadurieux@outlook.com. Some recipe's in life are worth the bother. This recipe by Emeril Lagasse is all in and ready to rock the July 4th week end. I wish human beings could have a tongue out day like the K-9 police dogs do.....this would be the time to start! Yeah, RateMyProfessor is nonsense. Now, those student evaluations the university conducts that determine your future? Totally different and valid. With or without the chili pepper, it is still nonsense with no statistically reliable information to be garnered and no proper survey protocols put in place. It does not even require proof that one is a student or has been a student in the class...Anyone who clicks "I am not a robot" can submit a Families Belong Together Shirt rating on any professor's page. It is nonsense and it will continue to be viewed as nonsense by any sane person at a university. A student could still write something in the comments section so not having a hotness rating doesn’t really matter.
Years ago I had them remove comments about my appearance that bordered on stalker. So removing it doesn’t prevent comments. First of all, administration should only be ratifying faculty hiring dicisions, so it should have no use for student ratings (faculty judges teaching). Second, rmp is useless as a tool for judging teaching. Third, and most shocking, the purpose of rmp is to help students find hot profs who teach easy course. It has now lost its raison d'être. Ugh, at least they've taken away the pepper. I dislike the site for many reasons (not the least of which is that anyone can say anything about anyone anonymously without any accountability, whether the commentator actually took a class from that person or not -- try it yourself, go and give a colleague a glowing review -- and the Jean Ralphio The Wooorst Three Jean Moon Shirt has absolutely no recourse except to dispute under their own name and so open themselves to trolling), but I especially loathed the chili pepper and avoided the site because I just... don't... want... to... know. These ratings may not be statistically valid, and certainly have self selection bias, but on a qualitative “anec-data” level, they definitely tend to paint quite an accurate picture of many professors’ teaching styles.
Maybe you like: https://photoxtee.com/trending/taylor-swift-cat-shirt/
Considering that several professors see comments about their appearance, sexually harassing comments, and character assaults in the Twitter-Style comments students leave there, and considering the website doesn't even require proof that one is a student in the class (a simple "Yes, I am in the class" and "I am not a robot" is not proof), I can't see how the majority of Rate-my-Professor ratings function even as a useful "anec-data" picture. Could you elaborate? It seems to me that many of the ones getting a 5 for easy are in fact the ones who give out A’s like candy and whose classes lack rigor. But is this statistically valid? No. Do I look at this website when I’m on a search committee screening Lebron James Ultimate Warrior T Shirt? No. Certainly should not be used for hiring decisions. But my few observations are that, like it or not, many of the reviews I have read give some amount of insight into how a faculty member behaves, not just in the classroom but as a colleague. I am still unclear on the utility here. If they aren't statistically valid, if we don't use them for hiring/promotion decisions, and should not because we cannot verify where and who the comments are coming from, why are we looking at it? How are you determining these portrayals are accurate? We can observe our colleagues as educators and as colleagues first-hand without a questionable website poll as a middle-man. Well, in this day and age of Yelp, Amazon reviews, and other “crowd sourced” information, the end user (in this case, students) will see great utility in “peer reviews” from their peers. Which means they still need to learn information literacy and critical source analysis skills. Since anyone can write anything on a Rate-My-Professor rating, without even proving that they had ever taken the course, it is a truly worthless site, even for students, and they shouldn't trust it either. You’re right that the reviews would be much more believable if the site somehow synced with student educational records to prove they took the class—the same way Amazon has “verified purchases”—but I’m sure you’d agree that FERPA laws and antiquated student record software would make this impossible for this site to implement. That doesn’t make them entirely useless for a reader, though. Just as unanimous No One Is Illegal On Stolen Land Shirt about an employer on Glassdoor are often correct, so unanimous reviews of a professor are often correct. “Grain of salt” applies, of course. If students want something like this, a far more reliable source would be to make the basic, anonymized, aggregate data from official evals conducted by the university which we are already collecting available to students rather than relying on a questionable third-party platform that generates revenue from ad sales. Even Amazon controls its own review system. By all means I don't think this website should be what qualifies those for employment; but like any review site (bias included), they paint an honest portrait of one's own experience. It shouldn't be seen as anything but a student-specific review platform. Well, if you were a student about to invest, say, $250,000 into your education, wouldn’t you want some source of information on the quality of teaching you will receive? And if your university makes no other reviews available, how are you supposed to make such a decision? Until such time as universities take teaching more seriously and are more transparent for students, sites like RMP will continue to thrive. If you want them to end, pressure your provost to publish the anonymous teaching reviews. Also, since we are complaining about what makes or does not make valid and reliable sources of rating and ranking information about higher education, perhaps we should have a different conversation about the validity and reliability of things like the US News and World Report rankings. Students can and do make serious enrollment decisions based on those rankings, and from my understanding, most of the time they are truly nothing more than a popularity contest among deans of different schools.
See more: Photoxtee
Comments
Post a Comment